Tuesday, April 24, 2007

ID cards

As a citizen of Poland (yet), I never considered an ID card to be a strange thing. That's because even though it is compulsory, an ID card itself doesn't reveal much information about me; a passport does. But Britons are worried about ID cards, and rightly so: both their ID cards and their passports, like Polish passports, will be documents issued by what they call the British police state. They will be forced to make private information about themselves available for the government, as Polish citizens must do now. That's actually the price the nationals of most of the world's states must pay for a passport, or even pay it for no reward.

This is a list of all the world's states, and the laws imposed by all those states on their citizens is mentioned state after state. As the article says, for most of the world's residents, it is compulsory to have an ID card, for the Portuguese when they are 10; for the Czechs when they are 15; for the Chinese when they are 16. That's right, the Portuguese law says that anyone who is 10 or older must purchase an ID card. And that is the EU-required law Blair will now impose on his citizens - unless they rebel. Latest poll indicates 15 million people will.

The British ID card law is an example of:
1) How leftists cheat parliaments
2) How leftist organisations work

1) The government and the Lords agreed a clause allowing those who need passports not to apply for ID cards, but now it's clear that if you don't want to have an ID card, you must never leave Britain until you die.

2) If a leftist organisation like the Labour Party wins an election, it tries to impose stupid laws on its citizens, and they always do so similarly:

1): The governing leftist organisation determines how to harm its citizens, and plans the action to be executed.
2): The leftist government drafts the relevant law.
3): The government asks the Parliament to approve the relevant law and set up the relevant agency, while they simoultaneously pretend they're not harming anyone.
4): The government's opponnents provide evidence, though not provided by the government itself, that disproves the government. This sometimes happen when the government doesn't even expect that proof to be provided by those who oppose it. For example, James Hall admitted ID cards would be compulsory during a normal chat session, not a debate with Conservative MPs.
5): A leaked or declassified government plan is published, thus making it obvious for everyone that the government was lying and indeed plans to harm its citizens - the people it is supposed to represent. The government (usually) stops denying it plans to impose a totalitarian law on the, but continues to claim that it isn't trying to harm its citizens, and executes the plan if it's legally able to do so. If it isn't, it doesn't do so.

No comments: