Wednesday, April 25, 2007
EU foreign minister
The EU's illegal minister responsible for EU Diplomatic service, Javier Solana, has continued to negotiate with the Iranian regime, begging Ahmadinejad not to produce nuclear weapons. Does anyone still deny that the Euroconstitution has been imposed on us already by the Eurocrats?
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
You must pay too
The European Parliament is the world's only parliament that has two seats (Strasbourg and Brussels), and the secretariat is in Luxembourg. The price we, European taxpayers, pay for this grotesque second seat, the Strasbourg seat, is £206 million (US$280 million) a year; that is, we would save that much money if the EP had only one seat. However, this is never going to happen.
This amount of cash - £206 million (US$280 million) a year - is not the only price we pay, TBH. For example, those who want to visit Strasbourg must book hotel rooms several months before we go there.
And what is the European Parliament?
It is supposed to mislead the European people to think that they are the ones governing the EU, which they are not. The EU police state is undemocratic, and therefore no one can be surprised that the European Commission and the EP ignore the famous petition signed by more than 1 million people
calling the EU to terminate the EP's second seat, even though the EC promised not to ignore it. The governments of the EU member states are ignoring us also, even the EC, the EP and our national governments are supposed to represent us. Indeed, the President of the European Parliament has said he will not allow the Parliament to debate about this. That means Eurocrats are not willing to not only terminate the Strasbourg seat of the EP, but even TALK about the EP's second seat.
Who can trust the EU to be willing to talk about anything if they're unwilling to talk even about reducing expenditures on bureaucracy?
Funny! They demand that we, the citizens of European states, drive less, while their limousines, which they ride every year from Brussels to Strasbourg and then from Strasbourg to Brussels emit more CO2 every year than all the cars owned by all Britons combined.
The EU should be dissolved.
This amount of cash - £206 million (US$280 million) a year - is not the only price we pay, TBH. For example, those who want to visit Strasbourg must book hotel rooms several months before we go there.
And what is the European Parliament?
It is supposed to mislead the European people to think that they are the ones governing the EU, which they are not. The EU police state is undemocratic, and therefore no one can be surprised that the European Commission and the EP ignore the famous petition signed by more than 1 million people
calling the EU to terminate the EP's second seat, even though the EC promised not to ignore it. The governments of the EU member states are ignoring us also, even the EC, the EP and our national governments are supposed to represent us. Indeed, the President of the European Parliament has said he will not allow the Parliament to debate about this. That means Eurocrats are not willing to not only terminate the Strasbourg seat of the EP, but even TALK about the EP's second seat.
Who can trust the EU to be willing to talk about anything if they're unwilling to talk even about reducing expenditures on bureaucracy?
Funny! They demand that we, the citizens of European states, drive less, while their limousines, which they ride every year from Brussels to Strasbourg and then from Strasbourg to Brussels emit more CO2 every year than all the cars owned by all Britons combined.
The EU should be dissolved.
ID cards
As a citizen of Poland (yet), I never considered an ID card to be a strange thing. That's because even though it is compulsory, an ID card itself doesn't reveal much information about me; a passport does. But Britons are worried about ID cards, and rightly so: both their ID cards and their passports, like Polish passports, will be documents issued by what they call the British police state. They will be forced to make private information about themselves available for the government, as Polish citizens must do now. That's actually the price the nationals of most of the world's states must pay for a passport, or even pay it for no reward.
This is a list of all the world's states, and the laws imposed by all those states on their citizens is mentioned state after state. As the article says, for most of the world's residents, it is compulsory to have an ID card, for the Portuguese when they are 10; for the Czechs when they are 15; for the Chinese when they are 16. That's right, the Portuguese law says that anyone who is 10 or older must purchase an ID card. And that is the EU-required law Blair will now impose on his citizens - unless they rebel. Latest poll indicates 15 million people will.
The British ID card law is an example of:
1) How leftists cheat parliaments
2) How leftist organisations work
1) The government and the Lords agreed a clause allowing those who need passports not to apply for ID cards, but now it's clear that if you don't want to have an ID card, you must never leave Britain until you die.
2) If a leftist organisation like the Labour Party wins an election, it tries to impose stupid laws on its citizens, and they always do so similarly:
1): The governing leftist organisation determines how to harm its citizens, and plans the action to be executed.
2): The leftist government drafts the relevant law.
3): The government asks the Parliament to approve the relevant law and set up the relevant agency, while they simoultaneously pretend they're not harming anyone.
4): The government's opponnents provide evidence, though not provided by the government itself, that disproves the government. This sometimes happen when the government doesn't even expect that proof to be provided by those who oppose it. For example, James Hall admitted ID cards would be compulsory during a normal chat session, not a debate with Conservative MPs.
5): A leaked or declassified government plan is published, thus making it obvious for everyone that the government was lying and indeed plans to harm its citizens - the people it is supposed to represent. The government (usually) stops denying it plans to impose a totalitarian law on the, but continues to claim that it isn't trying to harm its citizens, and executes the plan if it's legally able to do so. If it isn't, it doesn't do so.
This is a list of all the world's states, and the laws imposed by all those states on their citizens is mentioned state after state. As the article says, for most of the world's residents, it is compulsory to have an ID card, for the Portuguese when they are 10; for the Czechs when they are 15; for the Chinese when they are 16. That's right, the Portuguese law says that anyone who is 10 or older must purchase an ID card. And that is the EU-required law Blair will now impose on his citizens - unless they rebel. Latest poll indicates 15 million people will.
The British ID card law is an example of:
1) How leftists cheat parliaments
2) How leftist organisations work
1) The government and the Lords agreed a clause allowing those who need passports not to apply for ID cards, but now it's clear that if you don't want to have an ID card, you must never leave Britain until you die.
2) If a leftist organisation like the Labour Party wins an election, it tries to impose stupid laws on its citizens, and they always do so similarly:
1): The governing leftist organisation determines how to harm its citizens, and plans the action to be executed.
2): The leftist government drafts the relevant law.
3): The government asks the Parliament to approve the relevant law and set up the relevant agency, while they simoultaneously pretend they're not harming anyone.
4): The government's opponnents provide evidence, though not provided by the government itself, that disproves the government. This sometimes happen when the government doesn't even expect that proof to be provided by those who oppose it. For example, James Hall admitted ID cards would be compulsory during a normal chat session, not a debate with Conservative MPs.
5): A leaked or declassified government plan is published, thus making it obvious for everyone that the government was lying and indeed plans to harm its citizens - the people it is supposed to represent. The government (usually) stops denying it plans to impose a totalitarian law on the, but continues to claim that it isn't trying to harm its citizens, and executes the plan if it's legally able to do so. If it isn't, it doesn't do so.
More rights for the EU, less rights for member states
If you ever thought that the Euroconstitution, rejected by the French and the Dutch 2 years ago, is irrelevant, you need to wake up. The EU has, despite the referendal results, set up several institutions which it would be permitted to found if all member states ratified the Constitution Europeenne. One of those agencies is the Foreign Ministry of the EU, headed by Javier Solana, who already represents the EU abroad - he is the one to whom non-Europeans talk, NOT FMs of EU member states.
Regarding Iran, the Austrians have signed a certain pact with the Iranians today. The pact says the Austrians are going to exploit Iranian oil fields and pay the Iranians. Iran exports nothing else than oil and NG; a global embargo could make the Iranians penniless. But that is not going to happen, the Austrians don't believe the Iranians are dangerous; they don't believe the Iranians are producing nuclear weapons; they don't believe they should stop buying Iranian oil. How will they sing when attacked by the Iranians?
That's one more reason for the Americans to dump Continental Europe.
Dear readers, I have prepared a list of those European states which are pro-American, those which are anti-American (pro-Russian) and those which could theoretically be allies of the US and Britain if their leaders were convinced not to appease the Russians (pro-Russian=pro-Iranian, as Iran is just a client state of Russia).
Pro-American:
Britain
Czech Republic
Norway
Anti-American:
Finland
Spain
Austria
Italy
Sweden
Belgium
Greece
Romania
Bulgaria
Leaders of these states could be convinced:
France (election scheduled to occur 6th May 2007, the winner will certainly be Nicolas Sarkozy)
Portugal
Poland
Slovakia
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
Denmark
Hungary
Serbia
Montenegro
Albania
Croatia
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Neutral:
Switzerland
Iceland
Regarding Iran, the Austrians have signed a certain pact with the Iranians today. The pact says the Austrians are going to exploit Iranian oil fields and pay the Iranians. Iran exports nothing else than oil and NG; a global embargo could make the Iranians penniless. But that is not going to happen, the Austrians don't believe the Iranians are dangerous; they don't believe the Iranians are producing nuclear weapons; they don't believe they should stop buying Iranian oil. How will they sing when attacked by the Iranians?
That's one more reason for the Americans to dump Continental Europe.
Dear readers, I have prepared a list of those European states which are pro-American, those which are anti-American (pro-Russian) and those which could theoretically be allies of the US and Britain if their leaders were convinced not to appease the Russians (pro-Russian=pro-Iranian, as Iran is just a client state of Russia).
Pro-American:
Britain
Czech Republic
Norway
Anti-American:
Finland
Spain
Austria
Italy
Sweden
Belgium
Greece
Romania
Bulgaria
Leaders of these states could be convinced:
France (election scheduled to occur 6th May 2007, the winner will certainly be Nicolas Sarkozy)
Portugal
Poland
Slovakia
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
Denmark
Hungary
Serbia
Montenegro
Albania
Croatia
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Neutral:
Switzerland
Iceland
Hi everyone
This is the first time I'm publishing a message, so I think I should introduce myself. I'm Zbigniew Mazurak, a 19-year old man. I'm an enemy of the Eurocrats, the Mullahs and the Russians, and I will use this blog to tell you - the readers - about them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)