1) Why do you use the avatar you currently use?
Because I like nuclear weapons.
2) You've banned me! Why?
Depends. If you've behaved foolishly, then you are to blame. You can only email me if you wish.
3) I can send you whatever I want to send you, right?
Hahaha! No, you can't. You can and will be banned if you behave foolishly.
Saturday, September 8, 2007
Monday, July 9, 2007
Explanation
Those who read my posts about CO2 surely consider me to be an ecomoron who believes human-caused climate change is happening. I'd like to explain that I'm aware that human-caused climate change is a lie.
Saturday, June 23, 2007
Russian subversives
The British military (and the US Armed Forces) have been weakened by treacherous Western (American and British) politicians, both by serious military spending reductions and by disarmament treaties, at the same time Russia has been strengthening armed forces ever since 1945, except the 1991-1999 period, when Yeltsin was president. And even at that time the Russians were hostile to Westerners. Since 1961 Russia has also been supporting non-European states against the US. As Russia is more powerful than the EU, it will ultimately somehow conquer, militarily or not, the European Union.
The timeline:
1963 - The Limited Test Ban Treaty was signed by either Harold Macmillan or Alec Douglas. Whichever of them did so committed treason, as the LTBT, as the name suggests, forbids nuclear testing, except underground. This, as well as other so-called peace treaties and European treaties, was signed illegally, and the Treason Act of 1795 names the punishment: the death penalty, abolished by Blair 9 years ago. Of course, the Russians, who signed the teaty too, have violated it many times.
1970 - the Nonproliferation Treaty, signed by either Harold Wilson or Edward Heath, while allows the BM to have nuclear weapons, was a treaty signed with the Russians, thus misleading the British voters that the Russians were credible, which they were not. Russia has violated this treaty before 1991 - the Soviet Military gave some nukes to the Polish Armed Forces. And remember that the NPT was signed illegally.
1990-1997 The pseudoconservative government reduced the British nuclear arsenal instead of increasing it, and reduced military expenditures.
1997 - Tony Blair reduced the British nuclear arsenal instead of increasing it. He has also ratified the Chemical Weapons Treaty, thus forbidding the BM to use chemical weapons, even though the Russians and the North Koreans have them and do not intend to disarm themselves.
Since 1997 - Tony Blair has been weakening all three branches of the BM by reducing the size and the number of ships and planes, as well as issuing the BM with inappropriate equipment like Rover jeeps. Since 1997, the Army has been cut by 8,000 people, the Air Force by 16,000 people, and the Navy by 11,000 people. All of the British army personnel could be seated at the new Wembley Stadium, the Royal Navy has less vessels than the German Navy (severely reduced by post-1991 spending cutters), and the Air Force has less attack planes than the AF Museum. Ships sold unnecessarily to foreigners included Type 22 and Type 23 frigates - universal ships capable of defending other ships (or themselves) against any enemy.
1998 - Tony Blair repealed two Treason Acts shortly before he was supposed to be sentenced. Had he (Blair) not repealed those 2 Treason Acts, the jury would have declared them guilty and recommended capital punishment. Although Blair was tried for signing the Amsterdam Treaty, justice for signing 'peace treaties' and weakening the British military would have been served anyway.
2003 - The MOD has ordered 232 EF-2000s to replace Jaguars. This order is flawed for two reasons. First: the Jaguar is a bomber, and the EF-2000 is a fighter. Secondly, had the MOD ordered 232 F-35Bs instead, it would have cost it 50% less, and F-35Bs are better. This is just one example of how the MOD wasted much money on Europrestige programs rather than weapons which the British military needs. If you wish to know more, please read: http://eureferendum2.blogspot.com/2006/10/march-of-amateurs.html
2005 - HMS Invincible, the flagship of the Royal Navy, was prematurely mothballed, even though the replacement will not be commissioned until 2012.
2006 - the Ministry of Defence issued the tanker contract to the failed European company EADS, to replace L-1011 and three-engine VC10 tankers (which the AF would prefer to use instead of the planned replacements, the A330MRTT tankers). EADS is just a europrestige organisation that would be disbanded by 1971 had it not been for its sugar daddies. It was not until Ted Heath agreed to pay subsidies to EADS (founded 1970) that Britain was allowed to join the EU. Britain, by then one of the poorest European countries, would have been the EU's #1 net contributor, had it not been for the rebate negotiated 23 years ago. So Britain is now #2.
November 2006 - The KGB was able to enter Britain and murder a British citizen, Alexander Litvinenko, who was poisoned. This was the worst security failure since the last IRA bombing.
March 2007 - The Parliament voted to replace the current British nuclear arsenal, as well as submarines and missiles, however, it has also decided to reduce the arsenal by 20 warheads, to 180. 95 socialist MPs committed treason (they voted against the replacements of the currently used SLBMs).
April 2007 - The RN was humiliated when 15 sailors were kidnapped by the Iranians. The Iranians were able to do so because Blair forbid the RN to fight the Iranian Navy.
The timeline:
1963 - The Limited Test Ban Treaty was signed by either Harold Macmillan or Alec Douglas. Whichever of them did so committed treason, as the LTBT, as the name suggests, forbids nuclear testing, except underground. This, as well as other so-called peace treaties and European treaties, was signed illegally, and the Treason Act of 1795 names the punishment: the death penalty, abolished by Blair 9 years ago. Of course, the Russians, who signed the teaty too, have violated it many times.
1970 - the Nonproliferation Treaty, signed by either Harold Wilson or Edward Heath, while allows the BM to have nuclear weapons, was a treaty signed with the Russians, thus misleading the British voters that the Russians were credible, which they were not. Russia has violated this treaty before 1991 - the Soviet Military gave some nukes to the Polish Armed Forces. And remember that the NPT was signed illegally.
1990-1997 The pseudoconservative government reduced the British nuclear arsenal instead of increasing it, and reduced military expenditures.
1997 - Tony Blair reduced the British nuclear arsenal instead of increasing it. He has also ratified the Chemical Weapons Treaty, thus forbidding the BM to use chemical weapons, even though the Russians and the North Koreans have them and do not intend to disarm themselves.
Since 1997 - Tony Blair has been weakening all three branches of the BM by reducing the size and the number of ships and planes, as well as issuing the BM with inappropriate equipment like Rover jeeps. Since 1997, the Army has been cut by 8,000 people, the Air Force by 16,000 people, and the Navy by 11,000 people. All of the British army personnel could be seated at the new Wembley Stadium, the Royal Navy has less vessels than the German Navy (severely reduced by post-1991 spending cutters), and the Air Force has less attack planes than the AF Museum. Ships sold unnecessarily to foreigners included Type 22 and Type 23 frigates - universal ships capable of defending other ships (or themselves) against any enemy.
1998 - Tony Blair repealed two Treason Acts shortly before he was supposed to be sentenced. Had he (Blair) not repealed those 2 Treason Acts, the jury would have declared them guilty and recommended capital punishment. Although Blair was tried for signing the Amsterdam Treaty, justice for signing 'peace treaties' and weakening the British military would have been served anyway.
2003 - The MOD has ordered 232 EF-2000s to replace Jaguars. This order is flawed for two reasons. First: the Jaguar is a bomber, and the EF-2000 is a fighter. Secondly, had the MOD ordered 232 F-35Bs instead, it would have cost it 50% less, and F-35Bs are better. This is just one example of how the MOD wasted much money on Europrestige programs rather than weapons which the British military needs. If you wish to know more, please read: http://eureferendum2.blogspot.com/2006/10/march-of-amateurs.html
2005 - HMS Invincible, the flagship of the Royal Navy, was prematurely mothballed, even though the replacement will not be commissioned until 2012.
2006 - the Ministry of Defence issued the tanker contract to the failed European company EADS, to replace L-1011 and three-engine VC10 tankers (which the AF would prefer to use instead of the planned replacements, the A330MRTT tankers). EADS is just a europrestige organisation that would be disbanded by 1971 had it not been for its sugar daddies. It was not until Ted Heath agreed to pay subsidies to EADS (founded 1970) that Britain was allowed to join the EU. Britain, by then one of the poorest European countries, would have been the EU's #1 net contributor, had it not been for the rebate negotiated 23 years ago. So Britain is now #2.
November 2006 - The KGB was able to enter Britain and murder a British citizen, Alexander Litvinenko, who was poisoned. This was the worst security failure since the last IRA bombing.
March 2007 - The Parliament voted to replace the current British nuclear arsenal, as well as submarines and missiles, however, it has also decided to reduce the arsenal by 20 warheads, to 180. 95 socialist MPs committed treason (they voted against the replacements of the currently used SLBMs).
April 2007 - The RN was humiliated when 15 sailors were kidnapped by the Iranians. The Iranians were able to do so because Blair forbid the RN to fight the Iranian Navy.
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
China is now the #1 CO2 emitter
China will next year become the #1 CO2 emitter.
The claim that the Americans and the Brits are guilty is false. The Chinese nevertheless continue to lie that G8 nations, not them, are guilty.
The claim that the Americans and the Brits are guilty is false. The Chinese nevertheless continue to lie that G8 nations, not them, are guilty.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
The Tories
David Noakes claims that Edward Heath was the second-worst British traitor because he signed the 1972 ECSC Treaty. He also claims that the Conservative Party has been controlled by the EU since the 1960s, and the Labour Party and the Liberal Party since the 1980s. He is wrong.
Firstly, Edward Heath did sign the 1972 ECSC Treaty, but Britain became a member state of the EU because of an application submitted to Brussels by Harold Wilson, not Edward Heath, 1969.
Secondly, the Labour Party and the Liberal Party too, like the Conservative Party, have been controlled by the EU since the 1960s. Already 40 years ago all three were pro-EU parties. Harold Macmillan (a Tory) was the first British PM to submit an application to Brussels (he did so 1961), but Harold Wilson was the second, he submitted an application 1963. Like the first one, it was vetoed by Charles de Gaulle, the then French president. After CDG resigned 1969, Harold Wilson, as I already wrote, submitted the third British application.
Conclusion: the Labour Party, the Liberal Party and the SNP cannot be trusted. The Conservative Party can. The Tories just need to sack their Europhile leader.
Firstly, Edward Heath did sign the 1972 ECSC Treaty, but Britain became a member state of the EU because of an application submitted to Brussels by Harold Wilson, not Edward Heath, 1969.
Secondly, the Labour Party and the Liberal Party too, like the Conservative Party, have been controlled by the EU since the 1960s. Already 40 years ago all three were pro-EU parties. Harold Macmillan (a Tory) was the first British PM to submit an application to Brussels (he did so 1961), but Harold Wilson was the second, he submitted an application 1963. Like the first one, it was vetoed by Charles de Gaulle, the then French president. After CDG resigned 1969, Harold Wilson, as I already wrote, submitted the third British application.
Conclusion: the Labour Party, the Liberal Party and the SNP cannot be trusted. The Conservative Party can. The Tories just need to sack their Europhile leader.
Friday, June 8, 2007
Why Stavros Dimas is stupid
When George Bush announced his anti-GW-plan, Stavros Dimas labeled it as 'unambitious'. I could write an article about why this ungrateful chump should not criticise the president of the nation that defended his nation for 60 years, but because the plan announced by George Bush was about GW, I will now only comment about the European anti-GW-plan.
The European anti-GW-plan, announced 3 months ago, obliges EU member nations to reduce CO2 emissions by 20%. I'm curious: why should I believe that EU member nations will comply? No Polish coal-fired electric plant will be closed, according to that plan, and the Germans plan to build 26 coal-fired EPs.
The European anti-GW-plan, announced 3 months ago, obliges EU member nations to reduce CO2 emissions by 20%. I'm curious: why should I believe that EU member nations will comply? No Polish coal-fired electric plant will be closed, according to that plan, and the Germans plan to build 26 coal-fired EPs.
Why anti-G8 protestors are stupid
G8 member nations were often blamed for global warming. But anyone who has read the real CO2 emissions statistics knows that anti-G8 protestors are stupid. As this table indicates, all G8 member nations combined are responsible only for 50% of the quantity of CO2 that humanity emits. And unlike the Chinese and the Hindis, the Brits, the French, the Germans and the Italians, as EU citizens, promised to, and are obliged to, reduce CO2 emissions. The Chinese and the Hindis neither promised nor are obliged to reduce CO2 emissions.
George Bush is stupid indeed
Those who say George Bush is stupid are right. Why?
For 6 years the Russian dictator has been threatening us Westerners. His most recent threat is the threat that he will target Russian nuclear weapons at Europe. Simoultaneously, he has been strengthening (and continues to strengthen) the Russian military:
1) Since 2005 the Russian nuclear arsenal has been increased by 90 warheads
2) The Russian military has bought additional bombers
3) A new SSBN, RS Yuri Dolgoruki, is scheduled to be commissioned next year
etc.
The Russian dictator refused to withdraw Russian soldiers from Transnistria and Georgia; murders his countrymen; and murders Chechens. And yet that retard Bush naively tells me that Russia is not a threat, and that the Russians will never attack us Europeans.
Not only is Russia a threat, it's the deadliest threat, because it's the world's strongest (militarily) state.
The Russians will never attack Europe ONLY if European militaries are strengthened. However, the governments of European states have been, during the last 20 years, weakening European militaries. Therefore, I'm sure that the Russians will attack.
Weaklings only encourage aggressors to commit actions that they would otherwise not commit. Anyone who has read any history books knows that.
Not only have European militaries been weakened, but also the governments of Poland, Italy, Norway and Finland are pro-Russian. These countries have been lost to the Russians already.
So yes, Bush is a moron.
For 6 years the Russian dictator has been threatening us Westerners. His most recent threat is the threat that he will target Russian nuclear weapons at Europe. Simoultaneously, he has been strengthening (and continues to strengthen) the Russian military:
1) Since 2005 the Russian nuclear arsenal has been increased by 90 warheads
2) The Russian military has bought additional bombers
3) A new SSBN, RS Yuri Dolgoruki, is scheduled to be commissioned next year
etc.
The Russian dictator refused to withdraw Russian soldiers from Transnistria and Georgia; murders his countrymen; and murders Chechens. And yet that retard Bush naively tells me that Russia is not a threat, and that the Russians will never attack us Europeans.
Not only is Russia a threat, it's the deadliest threat, because it's the world's strongest (militarily) state.
The Russians will never attack Europe ONLY if European militaries are strengthened. However, the governments of European states have been, during the last 20 years, weakening European militaries. Therefore, I'm sure that the Russians will attack.
Weaklings only encourage aggressors to commit actions that they would otherwise not commit. Anyone who has read any history books knows that.
Not only have European militaries been weakened, but also the governments of Poland, Italy, Norway and Finland are pro-Russian. These countries have been lost to the Russians already.
So yes, Bush is a moron.
A lie repeated 1000 times becomes a true claim
A lie repeated 1000 times becomes a true claim. Or at least so believe Sigmar Gabriel (German Environment Minister), the Indian PM and Hu Jintao (Chinese President). Not only do they lie that global warming is really happening, they also blame everyone but their own nations for it.
The Indian PM blames the Brits and the Americans, even though India is the world's #5 CO2 emitter, while Britain is the #7 emitter. India emits every year 2 times more tonnes of CO2 than Britain.
The Chinese President said he will not agree to sign any treaty that would oblige his nation to reduce CO2 emissions. But China is already the world's #2 CO2 emitter, and will become the #1 emitter next year.
The German Environment Minister promised that his nation would reduce the number of tonnes of CO2 it emits yearly by 80% by 2050 - but simoultaneously the Germans are building 26 electric plants fired by lignite.
And guess which of the G8 member states emits less CO2 than any other?
Answer: France.
In France there are 59 nuclear reactors. That's why France emits only 363484 tonnes of CO2 every year. That is:
1) 25% less than Italy does
2) 30% less than Canada does
3) 34% less than Britain does
4) 2 times less than Germany does
5) 67% less than India does
6) 5 times less than Russia does
7) 10 times less than China does
8) 15 times less than America does
If the Chinese and the Hindis reduced CO2 emissions by 50% (if both nations would) and the French wouldn't, the Chinese would still be emitting 1763600 tons of CO2 every year (5 times more than the French do yearly), and the Hindis would still be emitting 503990 tons of CO2 every yer (27% more than the French do yearly).
So, when President Sarkozy arrived in Germany, no one could blame his nation. The Americans and the Brits were blamed, but not the French. I'm not surprised.
And - Mr President - because today is your younger stepdaughter's birthday, I wish her joyeux anniversaire.
The Indian PM blames the Brits and the Americans, even though India is the world's #5 CO2 emitter, while Britain is the #7 emitter. India emits every year 2 times more tonnes of CO2 than Britain.
The Chinese President said he will not agree to sign any treaty that would oblige his nation to reduce CO2 emissions. But China is already the world's #2 CO2 emitter, and will become the #1 emitter next year.
The German Environment Minister promised that his nation would reduce the number of tonnes of CO2 it emits yearly by 80% by 2050 - but simoultaneously the Germans are building 26 electric plants fired by lignite.
And guess which of the G8 member states emits less CO2 than any other?
Answer: France.
In France there are 59 nuclear reactors. That's why France emits only 363484 tonnes of CO2 every year. That is:
1) 25% less than Italy does
2) 30% less than Canada does
3) 34% less than Britain does
4) 2 times less than Germany does
5) 67% less than India does
6) 5 times less than Russia does
7) 10 times less than China does
8) 15 times less than America does
If the Chinese and the Hindis reduced CO2 emissions by 50% (if both nations would) and the French wouldn't, the Chinese would still be emitting 1763600 tons of CO2 every year (5 times more than the French do yearly), and the Hindis would still be emitting 503990 tons of CO2 every yer (27% more than the French do yearly).
So, when President Sarkozy arrived in Germany, no one could blame his nation. The Americans and the Brits were blamed, but not the French. I'm not surprised.
And - Mr President - because today is your younger stepdaughter's birthday, I wish her joyeux anniversaire.
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
EU foreign minister
The EU's illegal minister responsible for EU Diplomatic service, Javier Solana, has continued to negotiate with the Iranian regime, begging Ahmadinejad not to produce nuclear weapons. Does anyone still deny that the Euroconstitution has been imposed on us already by the Eurocrats?
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
You must pay too
The European Parliament is the world's only parliament that has two seats (Strasbourg and Brussels), and the secretariat is in Luxembourg. The price we, European taxpayers, pay for this grotesque second seat, the Strasbourg seat, is £206 million (US$280 million) a year; that is, we would save that much money if the EP had only one seat. However, this is never going to happen.
This amount of cash - £206 million (US$280 million) a year - is not the only price we pay, TBH. For example, those who want to visit Strasbourg must book hotel rooms several months before we go there.
And what is the European Parliament?
It is supposed to mislead the European people to think that they are the ones governing the EU, which they are not. The EU police state is undemocratic, and therefore no one can be surprised that the European Commission and the EP ignore the famous petition signed by more than 1 million people
calling the EU to terminate the EP's second seat, even though the EC promised not to ignore it. The governments of the EU member states are ignoring us also, even the EC, the EP and our national governments are supposed to represent us. Indeed, the President of the European Parliament has said he will not allow the Parliament to debate about this. That means Eurocrats are not willing to not only terminate the Strasbourg seat of the EP, but even TALK about the EP's second seat.
Who can trust the EU to be willing to talk about anything if they're unwilling to talk even about reducing expenditures on bureaucracy?
Funny! They demand that we, the citizens of European states, drive less, while their limousines, which they ride every year from Brussels to Strasbourg and then from Strasbourg to Brussels emit more CO2 every year than all the cars owned by all Britons combined.
The EU should be dissolved.
This amount of cash - £206 million (US$280 million) a year - is not the only price we pay, TBH. For example, those who want to visit Strasbourg must book hotel rooms several months before we go there.
And what is the European Parliament?
It is supposed to mislead the European people to think that they are the ones governing the EU, which they are not. The EU police state is undemocratic, and therefore no one can be surprised that the European Commission and the EP ignore the famous petition signed by more than 1 million people
calling the EU to terminate the EP's second seat, even though the EC promised not to ignore it. The governments of the EU member states are ignoring us also, even the EC, the EP and our national governments are supposed to represent us. Indeed, the President of the European Parliament has said he will not allow the Parliament to debate about this. That means Eurocrats are not willing to not only terminate the Strasbourg seat of the EP, but even TALK about the EP's second seat.
Who can trust the EU to be willing to talk about anything if they're unwilling to talk even about reducing expenditures on bureaucracy?
Funny! They demand that we, the citizens of European states, drive less, while their limousines, which they ride every year from Brussels to Strasbourg and then from Strasbourg to Brussels emit more CO2 every year than all the cars owned by all Britons combined.
The EU should be dissolved.
ID cards
As a citizen of Poland (yet), I never considered an ID card to be a strange thing. That's because even though it is compulsory, an ID card itself doesn't reveal much information about me; a passport does. But Britons are worried about ID cards, and rightly so: both their ID cards and their passports, like Polish passports, will be documents issued by what they call the British police state. They will be forced to make private information about themselves available for the government, as Polish citizens must do now. That's actually the price the nationals of most of the world's states must pay for a passport, or even pay it for no reward.
This is a list of all the world's states, and the laws imposed by all those states on their citizens is mentioned state after state. As the article says, for most of the world's residents, it is compulsory to have an ID card, for the Portuguese when they are 10; for the Czechs when they are 15; for the Chinese when they are 16. That's right, the Portuguese law says that anyone who is 10 or older must purchase an ID card. And that is the EU-required law Blair will now impose on his citizens - unless they rebel. Latest poll indicates 15 million people will.
The British ID card law is an example of:
1) How leftists cheat parliaments
2) How leftist organisations work
1) The government and the Lords agreed a clause allowing those who need passports not to apply for ID cards, but now it's clear that if you don't want to have an ID card, you must never leave Britain until you die.
2) If a leftist organisation like the Labour Party wins an election, it tries to impose stupid laws on its citizens, and they always do so similarly:
1): The governing leftist organisation determines how to harm its citizens, and plans the action to be executed.
2): The leftist government drafts the relevant law.
3): The government asks the Parliament to approve the relevant law and set up the relevant agency, while they simoultaneously pretend they're not harming anyone.
4): The government's opponnents provide evidence, though not provided by the government itself, that disproves the government. This sometimes happen when the government doesn't even expect that proof to be provided by those who oppose it. For example, James Hall admitted ID cards would be compulsory during a normal chat session, not a debate with Conservative MPs.
5): A leaked or declassified government plan is published, thus making it obvious for everyone that the government was lying and indeed plans to harm its citizens - the people it is supposed to represent. The government (usually) stops denying it plans to impose a totalitarian law on the, but continues to claim that it isn't trying to harm its citizens, and executes the plan if it's legally able to do so. If it isn't, it doesn't do so.
This is a list of all the world's states, and the laws imposed by all those states on their citizens is mentioned state after state. As the article says, for most of the world's residents, it is compulsory to have an ID card, for the Portuguese when they are 10; for the Czechs when they are 15; for the Chinese when they are 16. That's right, the Portuguese law says that anyone who is 10 or older must purchase an ID card. And that is the EU-required law Blair will now impose on his citizens - unless they rebel. Latest poll indicates 15 million people will.
The British ID card law is an example of:
1) How leftists cheat parliaments
2) How leftist organisations work
1) The government and the Lords agreed a clause allowing those who need passports not to apply for ID cards, but now it's clear that if you don't want to have an ID card, you must never leave Britain until you die.
2) If a leftist organisation like the Labour Party wins an election, it tries to impose stupid laws on its citizens, and they always do so similarly:
1): The governing leftist organisation determines how to harm its citizens, and plans the action to be executed.
2): The leftist government drafts the relevant law.
3): The government asks the Parliament to approve the relevant law and set up the relevant agency, while they simoultaneously pretend they're not harming anyone.
4): The government's opponnents provide evidence, though not provided by the government itself, that disproves the government. This sometimes happen when the government doesn't even expect that proof to be provided by those who oppose it. For example, James Hall admitted ID cards would be compulsory during a normal chat session, not a debate with Conservative MPs.
5): A leaked or declassified government plan is published, thus making it obvious for everyone that the government was lying and indeed plans to harm its citizens - the people it is supposed to represent. The government (usually) stops denying it plans to impose a totalitarian law on the, but continues to claim that it isn't trying to harm its citizens, and executes the plan if it's legally able to do so. If it isn't, it doesn't do so.
More rights for the EU, less rights for member states
If you ever thought that the Euroconstitution, rejected by the French and the Dutch 2 years ago, is irrelevant, you need to wake up. The EU has, despite the referendal results, set up several institutions which it would be permitted to found if all member states ratified the Constitution Europeenne. One of those agencies is the Foreign Ministry of the EU, headed by Javier Solana, who already represents the EU abroad - he is the one to whom non-Europeans talk, NOT FMs of EU member states.
Regarding Iran, the Austrians have signed a certain pact with the Iranians today. The pact says the Austrians are going to exploit Iranian oil fields and pay the Iranians. Iran exports nothing else than oil and NG; a global embargo could make the Iranians penniless. But that is not going to happen, the Austrians don't believe the Iranians are dangerous; they don't believe the Iranians are producing nuclear weapons; they don't believe they should stop buying Iranian oil. How will they sing when attacked by the Iranians?
That's one more reason for the Americans to dump Continental Europe.
Dear readers, I have prepared a list of those European states which are pro-American, those which are anti-American (pro-Russian) and those which could theoretically be allies of the US and Britain if their leaders were convinced not to appease the Russians (pro-Russian=pro-Iranian, as Iran is just a client state of Russia).
Pro-American:
Britain
Czech Republic
Norway
Anti-American:
Finland
Spain
Austria
Italy
Sweden
Belgium
Greece
Romania
Bulgaria
Leaders of these states could be convinced:
France (election scheduled to occur 6th May 2007, the winner will certainly be Nicolas Sarkozy)
Portugal
Poland
Slovakia
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
Denmark
Hungary
Serbia
Montenegro
Albania
Croatia
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Neutral:
Switzerland
Iceland
Regarding Iran, the Austrians have signed a certain pact with the Iranians today. The pact says the Austrians are going to exploit Iranian oil fields and pay the Iranians. Iran exports nothing else than oil and NG; a global embargo could make the Iranians penniless. But that is not going to happen, the Austrians don't believe the Iranians are dangerous; they don't believe the Iranians are producing nuclear weapons; they don't believe they should stop buying Iranian oil. How will they sing when attacked by the Iranians?
That's one more reason for the Americans to dump Continental Europe.
Dear readers, I have prepared a list of those European states which are pro-American, those which are anti-American (pro-Russian) and those which could theoretically be allies of the US and Britain if their leaders were convinced not to appease the Russians (pro-Russian=pro-Iranian, as Iran is just a client state of Russia).
Pro-American:
Britain
Czech Republic
Norway
Anti-American:
Finland
Spain
Austria
Italy
Sweden
Belgium
Greece
Romania
Bulgaria
Leaders of these states could be convinced:
France (election scheduled to occur 6th May 2007, the winner will certainly be Nicolas Sarkozy)
Portugal
Poland
Slovakia
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
Denmark
Hungary
Serbia
Montenegro
Albania
Croatia
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Neutral:
Switzerland
Iceland
Hi everyone
This is the first time I'm publishing a message, so I think I should introduce myself. I'm Zbigniew Mazurak, a 19-year old man. I'm an enemy of the Eurocrats, the Mullahs and the Russians, and I will use this blog to tell you - the readers - about them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)